The Continuing Education Platform for Plaintiff's Attorneys to Maximize Bodily Injury Settlement Valuation...
The Continuing Education Platform for Plaintiff's Attorneys to Maximize Bodily Injury Settlement Valuation...
CLE COURSES AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION IN PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEYS OFFICES AT NO COST.
When a personal injury client entrusts their well-being into your hands, you formulate a demand based on the medical, administrative, economic and legal factors of the claim. However, for 27 years we've been competing against the insurers' computers as Colossus and the computer often won, until now!
The CLE Courses present data that plaintiff's attorneys are using today in bodily injury claims to:
SUBJECTS INCLUDE:
Please peruse our courses to determine which ones would be of highest interest and contact a course presenter to arrange a CLE Accredited Presentation in your office.
Each Course Contains Data To Identify & Counter These 4 Major Areas of Risk Management Insurers Use To Contain Costs As;
1.) Colossus
Overcoming Colossus & Other Software's
2.) Significant Differences in the Medical Records That Adversely Affects Injury Settlement Valuation
Harmful Factors to be Aware of in the Medical Assessment of the Injured
3.) The 13 Unfair Claims Settlement Practice Acts (UCSPA's) & Rebuttal When There are Violations of the Ethics Codes of the Adjuster (this is not Bad Faith)
Identifying and Countering UCSPA’s & Violations of the Ethics Codes of the Adjuster That Lower Valuation
4.) Adjuster & IME Disputes
Using Authority to Overcome Varying Opinions & Win the Great Weight Challenges
Select the Course You are Most Interested In And Notify A Course Presenter
Course #1
Formulating an Injury Claim to Prevent Disputes and Maximize Settlement Valuation
This program is accredited as Follows:
CLE Credits: General 1.0
Effective demand formulation methods plaintiff's attorneys are using to prevent, even reverse discounted bodily injury valuations, eliminate varying adjuster & IME opinions, win the greater weight of the evidence challenges, counter the 13 unfair claims settlement practice acts and identify bodily injury severity types that are often overlooked and can damage the injured as well as the claim.
A demand is formulated on the medical, administrative, economic and legal factors of the claim and for 27 years we've been competing against the insurer's computers as Colossus and the computer usually wins, until now!
This presentation contains data that plaintiff's attorneys are using in bodily injury claims to;
SUBJECTS INCLUDE:
When a personal injury client entrusts their well-being into your hands, you have to compete against the insurers software's (as Colossus), counter adjuster and IME disputes and the engagement of any of their 13 Unfair Claims Settlement Practice Acts (UCSPA's), place yourself at the mercy of medical experts who utilize different examination levels that make a big difference in bodily injury valuation parameters and you may never consider that there are injuries that go undetected, especially ones that can severely damage the injured party and the claim when overlooked.
Course #2
Lessen the Necessity Of Trial In a Bodily Injury Claim
This program is accredited as Follows:
CLE Credits: General 2.5
Civil Trial Credits: 2.00
Identifying Unfair Claim Settlement Practice Acts And Making An Effective Rebuttal To Reduce Unfair Bodily Injury Valuation And Lessen The Incidence Of The Need For Trial
When a personal injury client entrusts their well-being into your hands, you are up against a barrage of insurance company tactics designed to contain costs by lowering the valuation of a bodily injury claim.
Despite a 2012 report released by the CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA that stated;
"computer claims software's are now being used by all insurers and can be manipulated to produce unjustifiably low injury payments to consumers and tens of millions of dollars in illegitimate 'savings' for insurers"
...insurers' are no respecters of your skill, experience or knowledge. You face "Unfair Claims Settlement Practice Acts" (UCSPA), software's as Colossus (with now 80 versions)," Business Process Improvement" (BPI), IME's who dispute and deny, varying opinions, violations of the Ethics Codes of the Adjuster, claims omissions and 12 Unfair Claim Settlement Practice Acts (UCSPA).
These are the cost containment measures used by insurers that have resulted in unfair, unrealistic, low settlement valuations for the injured.
It's been stated that only 2% of bodily injury claims go to court. Insurers are fully aware of this statistic and will challenge plaintiff's attorney to the maximum as a result.
This presentation will aid to protect your injury clients' rights with effective methods now being used to counter unfair claims tactics and reduce the need for trial by countering the UCSPA's with methods to:
However, if you go to trial, we will discuss strategies to:
Course #3
How To Prevent Unfair Injury Settlements
This program is accredited for
3.00 total credits.
Verified participation entitles attendee to
3.00 total credits.
Effective Tools to Prevent Unfair Settlements, Eliminate Varying Opinions and Win the "Greater Weight" of the Evidence Challenges for Plaintiff Injury Attorneys.
The insurance companies first engaged Colossus, now there are 80 different versions with 67,880 procedural intelligence (PI) codes to determine the range of value for a BI Claim used by all insurers. Now they created "Business Processing Improvement", more recently introduced, (BPI) a culture that contains additional cost containment measures to limit bodily injury settlements which is making it difficult for plaintiff's attorneys to oppose, without specific knowledge of how the system works.
Even though a Superior Court has issued an order to the insurers to release their PI codes, they have ignored the order in lieu of paying a ten million dollar regulatory fine for civil disrespect.
There are 12 Unfair Claim Settlement Practice Acts (UCSPA's) all designed to dispute, deny and lower settlement valuation and it continues as yet another Superior Court ruled that one unfair claims settlement practice act known as "Core Claim Process Redesign" ratchets down claim value by 2/3rd's and was ruled "harmful to public interest".
While many plaintiff's attorneys have systems in place for representing B.I. claims, unfortunately, the advent of B.P.I. has changed the relevance and signifcance of demand components that many have been using for years and are no longer as effective since B.P.I. We will reveal effective methods to counter Colossus, UCSPA's, explain and suggest how to navigate BPI to prevent unfair, unrealistic settlements, eliminate varying opinions, establish preponderance and win the "Greater Weight" of the evidence challenges.
In our effort to help plaintiff's attorneys serve at"Best Practice"against insurers in BI claims this presentation will present;
Course #4
Law and Ethics - In Bodily Injury Claims
This program is accredited for
3.00 total ethics credits.
Verified participation entitles attendee to
3.00 total ethics credits.
ETHICS; LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Every claim on which an adjuster works has the potential to raise ethical questions and concerns. At times while performing these roles, claim adjusters fail to uphold the ethical requirements imposed upon them, which can be considered a deviation from the standard of care in claim handling.
ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) -- If you are injured in a minor car crash, chances are good that you will be in the fight of your life to get the insurance company to pay all the medical costs you incur -- even if the accident was no fault of your own.
Also Published On CNN Website:
CNN reported seeing several of Allstate's policy documents during a court hearing in Lexington, Kentucky. Playing off Allstate's signature slogan, one document recommends the insurer put boxing gloves on its "good hands" for those who insist on going to court.
There are regulatory actions, fines, investigations and accounting's of unfair claim settlement practice acts (UCSPA), violations of the ethics codes of the adjuster and deceptive trade practices going on in the insurance industry when bodily injury claims are involved.
It's not just Allstate. Today, all insurers use software's to determine bodily injury claim settlement valuation and there are 80 different versions. As if Colossus and UCSPA's weren't enough to contain costs, the insurers also created "Business Process Improvement" (BPI), by which insurers have made it even more difficult to understand and navigate a bodily injury claim without having specific knowledge of how their system works.
Even though a Superior Court has issued an order to the insurers to release their coveted secrets, they have ignored the order claiming their right to withhold their "intellectual property" and opted to pay a ten million dollar regulatory fine for civil disrespect.
There are 12 Unfair Claim Settlement Practice Acts (UCSPA's) all designed to dispute, deny, omit and lower settlement valuation on bodily injury claims and it continues as yet another Superior Court ruled that one unfair claims settlement practice act known as "Core Claim Process Redesign" ratchets down claim value by 2/3rd's and was ruled "harmful to public interest" by a Superior Court.
In this presentation we will reveal effective methods to counter Colossus, UCSPA's, explain and suggest how to navigate BPI to prevent unfair, unrealistic settlements, eliminate varying opinions, establish preponderance and win the "Greater Weight" of the evidence challenges.
In our effort to help plaintiff's attorneys serve at "Best Practice" against insurers in BI claims this presentation will;
Course #5
Maximizing Settlement Valuation in a Bodily Injury (Colossus) Claim and How To Identify and Overcome Ethics Codes Violations
This program is accredited for
3 Hrs General and 2 Hrs Ethics
Verified participation entitles attendee to
5.00 total credits.
This presentation contains data that plaintiff’s attorneys are using in bodily injury claims to;
SUBJECTS INCLUDE:
As if Colossus wasn’t enough. 27 years of fighting against a computer and then insurers created "Business Processing Improvement" (BPI). This more recently introduced process of BPI is described as a “culture” that contains additional cost containment measures to further impose limitations on representing bodily injury claims, making it difficult for plaintiff's attorneys to oppose, without specific knowledge of how the system works.
Attorney and Colossus experts have reported that BPI imposes demands to format injuries into a TABLE listing the body parts, organs, systems or functions that have been involved and cite their degree of impairment by edition, chapter, table and page of AMA Guides, referred to as “Table Formatting” as well as mirror the medical file in the demand and eliminating demands formatted in narrative styles.
With all of this, it’s difficult to keep up with the news and changes and insurers are not eager to reveal it all as a Superior Court ordered them to release information and after they refused, the court ruled that one claim settlement practice act was "harmful to public interest".
The advent of B.P.I. has changed the relevance and significance of the demand components that involves different language, sequencing and formatting requirements.
This cite offers CLE Courses that reveal effective methods to; counter Colossus, UCSPA's, explain and suggest how to navigate BPI to prevent unfair, unrealistic settlements, eliminate varying opinions, establish preponderance and win the "Greater Weight" of the evidence challenges using the insurance companies own codes against them to counter Colossus and prevent unfair settlements
We reveal effective methods to use against insurers in BI claims and this presentation will present;